From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:16:25 GMT Subject: Re: Promoting Git developers Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Christian Couder writes: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Stefan Beller wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:20 AM, David Kastrup wrote: >>> >>> "Git Annotate"? >> >> "Git Praise" as opposed to blame? >> "Git Who" as a pun on the subcommand structure which doesn't always >> follows grammar? > > Yeah these suggestions above are nice, thanks for them, but "Git Rev News" > also look a bit like "git rev-list" and "git rev-parse" which are plumbing Git > commands, so it gives a somewhat "hardcore" look to the news letter which > I like. Call that "Git Rev List" then to be more direct? I myself liked the "Review" (spelled in full word) as its non-nerdy sound, as a suitable name for a publication that bridges between hard-core developers and slightly-more-serious-than-casual observers, but its not my call (and as I often say, I am not good at naming things) ;-).