Re: [RFC/PATCH] config: add core.trustmtime
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 30, 2015, 19:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq610j8fzt.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACBZZX4jJ_b-5sbor6YibXGASeOa0gx8nEBiv8=54yoHfWL8Fw@mail.gmail.com>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Maybe I'm missing some really common breakage with st_mtime on some > system, but having a feature the user explicitly enables turn itself > off and doing FS-testing that takes 10 seconds when it's enabled seems > like the wrong default to me. > > We don't do it with core.fileMode, core.ignorecase or core.trustctime > or core.symlinks. Do we really need to be treating this differently?
I share the exact thought. I was looking the other way when untracked-cache was done originally ;-), and I would also want to know the answers to the above questions.
Thanks.