From: Junio C Hamano Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:05:42 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] config: add core.trustmtime Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes: > Maybe I'm missing some really common breakage with st_mtime on some > system, but having a feature the user explicitly enables turn itself > off and doing FS-testing that takes 10 seconds when it's enabled seems > like the wrong default to me. > > We don't do it with core.fileMode, core.ignorecase or core.trustctime > or core.symlinks. Do we really need to be treating this differently? I share the exact thought. I was looking the other way when untracked-cache was done originally ;-), and I would also want to know the answers to the above questions. Thanks.