Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sparse-checkout: add 'clean' command
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 29, 2025, 00:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq5xe7q8f5.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <CABPp-BH=tk3eenHJkbRcD8uLGuakNMT5GkjVt6WfmOO8P+xq7A@mail.gmail.com>
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:
Show 17 quoted lines
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 4:22 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> This seems to have a few comments that haven't been responded to >> (plus a "This step looks good to me" or two). Can we get it unstuck >> soonish? The topic is from mid July and I do not like to hold topics >> in 'seen' for longer than a month without any activity. > > Stolee built this series on top of Ayush's topic to avoid conflicts > for you, and he said > (https://lore.kernel.org/git/c3c0fbef-f395-4972-8352-dd89af6799d5@gmail.com/) > that since you marked this as blocking on Ayush's topic, he didn't > want to update until that topic moved. > > Do you want to instead kick Ayush's topic out and have Stolee rebase > to no longer be on top of Ayush's, and have Ayush rebase anything he > might do on top of Stolee's work? (See also Ayush's recent update at > https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAE7as+ZpEwiNsDAozoZXqHRLOF3+hT++uo=mzZqEvTPovQN9uw@mail.gmail.com/)
It really depends on how unstable the base topic would be, but I know Stolee is better than building his stuff on unusably unstable crap, and that was the reason why I thought that updating this topic on top of the same base would allow us to move forward faster, as it would mean that everything would hopefully be ready _UNLESS_ the change that needs to be made to the base topic is so extensive that the topic on top would also need heavy updates _again_ once an update to the base topic comes.