Re: [RFC/PATCHv2] Documentation: triangular workflow

From: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Date: Jun 7, 2016, 06:58 UTC
Message-ID: <vpqziqxbi3d.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
In-Reply-To: <12C5A5F1276946DC99A03F30FEE49559@PhilipOakley>

"Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes:

Show 9 quoted lines

> Given that clarification I'd be happier to go with it being one's
> 'Publish' repo.
>
> My initial reticence was because of the association of "publish" with
> vanity publishing and other forms of over-sharing and self promotion.
>
> A clarification/explanation that calling it a 'publish' repo is about
> granting access, and possible open access, would make it more
> acceptable.

I think "publish" is the best we found up to now.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.