[RFC] Triangular Workflow UI improvments

> Le 27 mai 2016 à 09:32, Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org> a écrit :
> For me, the first step would be to actually document a (the?) Triangular Workflow in the documentation, so we are all taking about the same broad method.
> 
> At the moment there is a choice (assuming a ithub like service) of either clone and then fork, or fork and clone the fork, which leave the user with different fixups of their config's being required, so describing the easier one would help folk.
> 
> Likewise there are missing terms such as for the third place (the personal fork) that is neither the upstream, nor the local repo. Making sure the terminology is crisp and clean will greatly ease any implementation issues. And then there are the possible workflows...