Re: [RFC/PATCH] Triangular Workflow UI improvement: Documentation

> From: "Matthieu Moy" <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
>
>> But then the maintainer is not the one picking changes from it (you're
>> sending them by email), so the "maintainer" label is not really accurate
>> in the diagram:
>>
>> +------------               -----------
>> +| UPSTREAM |  maintainer   | ORIGIN  |
>> +|  git/git |- - - - - - - -|  me/git |
>> +------------       ←       -----------
>> +         \                   /
>> +          \                 /
>> +     fetch↓\               /↑push
>> +            \             /
>> +             \           /
>> +             -------------
>> +             |   LOCAL   |
>> +             -------------
>>
> Ahh, that's a useful clarification. I use my git repo both for the G4W
> (which does take pull requests) and for Junio's Git.
>
> The use of the 'home-vault' fork as being for
> (a) backup,
> (b) open viewing, and
> (c) sending pull requests
> are subtle distinctions for the naming (of both the forked repo, and
> the workflow).
>
> It's probably even worse in a corporate environment as to how personal
> the personal home vault is, as compared to just having a namespace in
> a centralised dev server/repo. (the question of how to make such
> arrangements seems to come up moderately often on the various lists)