From: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 06:58:46 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCHv2] Documentation: triangular workflow
Message-ID: <vpqziqxbi3d.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
In-Reply-To: <12C5A5F1276946DC99A03F30FEE49559@PhilipOakley>

"Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes:

> Given that clarification I'd be happier to go with it being one's
> 'Publish' repo.
>
> My initial reticence was because of the association of "publish" with
> vanity publishing and other forms of over-sharing and self promotion.
>
> A clarification/explanation that calling it a 'publish' repo is about
> granting access, and possible open access, would make it more
> acceptable.

I think "publish" is the best we found up to now.

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/