Re: [PATCH] send-pack: use buffered I/O to talk to pack-objects
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Jun 9, 2016, 12:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqwplypnpr.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160608194216.GA3731@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 14 quoted lines
> --- a/send-pack.c
> +++ b/send-pack.c
> @@ -36,18 +36,15 @@ int option_parse_push_signed(const struct option *opt,
> die("bad %s argument: %s", opt->long_name, arg);
> }
>
> -static int feed_object(const unsigned char *sha1, int fd, int negative)
> +static void feed_object(const unsigned char *sha1, FILE *fh, int negative)
> {
> - char buf[42];
> -
> if (negative && !has_sha1_file(sha1))
> - return 1;
> + return;[...]
> @@ -97,21 +95,22 @@ static int pack_objects(int fd, struct ref *refs, struct sha1_array *extra, stru
[...]
> for (i = 0; i < extra->nr; i++) > - if (!feed_object(extra->sha1[i], po.in, 1)) > - break; > + feed_object(extra->sha1[i], po_in, 1);
I may have missed the obvious, but doesn't this change the behavior when "negative && !has_sha1_file(sha1)" happens? I understand that you don't need write_or_whine anymore, but don't understand how you get rid of the "return 1" here.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/