Re: [PATCH] ci: use actions/{upload,download}-artifact@v3

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
> >> This is probably incorrect, but you wouldn't know until something failed
> >> in the `linux32` job.
> >
> > Yeah, that was what I was afraid to see.
> >
> >> I already have a correct fix in
> >> https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/pull/4112/commits/b59c1e33fa62029f8d5dca801a8afb480514140c
> >> and was only waiting for the patch at the root of this here mail thread to
> >> advance further so I could contribute that fix, along with other
> >> replacements for deprecated operations.
> >
> > Wonderful.
> >
> >> Maybe we can move these changes forward in a more orderly manner, with
> >> Oscar's patch advancing to `next` once it is done, and the other patches
> >> following after that?
> >
> > That was what I was planning to do anyway.  Thanks.
>
> Eh, I should have made my intention clear.  I'll drop this one (as I
> posted it primarily to fish out those who are interested in and more
> capable than I am at clearing the deprecation warnings from the CI),
> will mark Oscar's for 'next' (if I haven't done so already), wait for
> your updates and queue them on a topic forked from Oscar's (or on
> the same Oscar's topic), and cook them for the first or the second
> batch of the next cycle.