Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] doc: revert: add discussion
- From
- Linus Arver <linusa@google.com>
- Date
- Aug 10, 2023, 22:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <owly5y5mh81i.fsf@fine.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <owly8raih8ho.fsf@fine.c.googlers.com>
Linus Arver <linusa@google.com> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> How about > the following rewording? > > While git creates a basic commit message automatically, it is > _strongly_ recommended to explain why the original commit is being > reverted. In addition, repeatedly reverting the same commit will
Hmph, "repeatedly reverting the same commit" sounds wrong because strictly speaking there is only 1 "same commit" (the original commit). Perhaps
In addition, repeatedly reverting the same progression of reverts will
or even
In addition, repeatedly reverting the same revert chain will
is better here?