From: Linus Arver <linusa@google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 22:00:41 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] doc: revert: add discussion
Message-ID: <owly5y5mh81i.fsf@fine.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <owly8raih8ho.fsf@fine.c.googlers.com>

Linus Arver <linusa@google.com> writes:

> How about
> the following rewording?
>
>     While git creates a basic commit message automatically, it is
>     _strongly_ recommended to explain why the original commit is being
>     reverted. In addition, repeatedly reverting the same commit will

Hmph, "repeatedly reverting the same commit" sounds wrong because
strictly speaking there is only 1 "same commit" (the original commit).
Perhaps

    In addition, repeatedly reverting the same progression of reverts will

or even

    In addition, repeatedly reverting the same revert chain will

is better here?