Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] doc: revert: add discussion

>On 10/08/2023 23:00, Linus Arver wrote:
>> Linus Arver <linusa@google.com> writes:
>> 
>>> How about
>>> the following rewording?
>>>
>>>      While git creates a basic commit message automatically, it is
>>>      _strongly_ recommended to explain why the original commit is being
>>>      reverted. In addition, repeatedly reverting the same commit will
>> 
>> Hmph, "repeatedly reverting the same commit" sounds wrong because
>> strictly speaking there is only 1 "same commit" (the original commit).
>
>While it isn't strictly accurate I think that wording is easy enough to 
>understand.
>