Re: [PATCH v2] sequencer: beautify subject of reverts of reverts

From: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
Date: Jul 28, 2023, 09:45 UTC
Message-ID: <ZMOOQTMk2wFwtSfa@ugly>
In-Reply-To: <owly7cqkfvyu.fsf@fine.c.googlers.com>

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 10:26:01PM -0700, Linus Arver wrote:

>How about introducing a suffix (+ or -) after the word "Revert" to
>indicate the application/inclusion (+) or removal (-) of a commit?
>

i think that falls squarely into the "too nerdy" category, like the Revert^n proposal does.

>(Sorry for jumping into this thread so late, but the mention of this
>topic on the recent "What's cooking" message [1] (that this topic would
>be discarded) got me interested.)
>

i actually have finally updated my patches, but then found a problem in my script i'm using for submitting them, and want to fix that first for dogfooding purposes. shouldn't be long.

regards

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.