Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] rebase -i: extend rebase.missingCommitsCheck
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 26, 2020, 10:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2001261043540.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200125175436.29786-1-alban.gruin@gmail.com>
Hi Alban,
On Sat, 25 Jan 2020, Alban Gruin wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Changes since v4: > > - Added a test to check that no errors are raised when editing the todo > list after pausing the rebase; it was provided by Phillip Wood. > > - Fixed the issue pointed out by this test by creating a backup of the > todo list even if the edited list is incorrect. This step was moved > before the user edits the list, so the backup can be created with > copy_file() instead of todo_list_write_to_file().
Please note that I changed this to always use `todo_list_write_to_file()` in `js/rebase-i-with-colliding-hash` (see e.g. https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/commit/26027625).
The reason is that the copy would be made with _abbreviated_ commit IDs. And during the rebase, those abbreviated IDs could become non-unique.
I have to admit that I did not follow the evolution of your patch series terribly closely, but from your description I gather that we want to be careful to ensure that the `.backup` file is written with non-abbreviated commit IDs always.
The way I read your patches, they will conflict with `js/rebase-i-with-colliding-hash`, so maybe it would be a good idea to base your patches on that branch?
Thanks, Dscho
Show 125 quoted lines
>
> - In edit_todo_list(), `incorrect' is set to 0 by default. This only
> concerns the initial edit case; instead of opening and parsing the
> backup, we use directly `old_todo' as a reference.
>
> - Don't check if the "dropped" file flag exists at the initial edit.
>
> Alban Gruin (2):
> sequencer: move check_todo_list_from_file() to rebase-interactive.c
> rebase-interactive: warn if commit is dropped with `rebase
> --edit-todo'
>
> rebase-interactive.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> rebase-interactive.h | 5 ++
> sequencer.c | 51 ++++----------
> sequencer.h | 2 +-
> t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> Range-diff against v4:
> 1: 996045a300 = 1: 996045a300 sequencer: move check_todo_list_from_file() to rebase-interactive.c
> 2: 11b0e1e78c ! 2: 6dbaa8cbe6 rebase-interactive: warn if commit is dropped with `rebase --edit-todo'
> @@ Commit message
> `edit_todo_list_advice' is removed from sequencer.c as it is no longer
> used there.
>
> - This changes when a backup of the todo list is made. Until now, it
> - was saved only once, before the initial edit. Now, it is also made if
> - after the user edited the list, if it has no errors or if no commits
> - were dropped and `rebase.missingCommitsCheck' is set. Thus, the
> + This changes when a backup of the todo list is made. Until now, it was
> + saved only once, before the initial edit. Now, it is also made if the
> + original todo list has no errors or no dropped commits. Thus, the
> backup should be error-free. Without this, sequencer_continue()
> (`rebase --continue') could only compare the current todo list against
> the original, unedited list. Before this change, this file was only
> @@ Commit message
> no errors were found at the last edition, so any missing commits here
> have already been picked.
>
> - Four tests are added to t3404. The tests for
> + Five tests are added to t3404. The tests for
> `rebase.missingCommitsCheck = warn' and `rebase.missingCommitsCheck =
> error' have a similar structure. First, we start a rebase with an
> incorrect command on the first line. Then, we edit the todo list,
> @@ Commit message
> has been dropped. Then, the actual rebase takes place. In the third
> test, it is also checked that `--continue' will refuse to resume the
> rebase if commits were dropped. The fourth test checks that no errors
> - are raised when resuming a rebase after resolving a conflict.
> + are raised when resuming a rebase after resolving a conflict, the fifth
> + checks that no errors are raised when editing the todo list after
> + pausing the rebase.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com>
> I don't think the way I create `expect.3' files in "rebase --edit-todo
> @@ rebase-interactive.c: int edit_todo_list(struct repository *r, struct todo_list
> + const char *todo_file = rebase_path_todo(),
> + *todo_backup = rebase_path_todo_backup();
> unsigned initial = shortrevisions && shortonto;
> -+ int incorrect = 1;
> ++ int incorrect = 0;
>
> /* If the user is editing the todo list, we first try to parse
> * it. If there is an error, we do not return, because the user
> * might want to fix it in the first place. */
> if (!initial)
> - todo_list_parse_insn_buffer(r, todo_list->buf.buf, todo_list);
> -+ incorrect = todo_list_parse_insn_buffer(r, todo_list->buf.buf, todo_list);
> -+
> -+ incorrect |= file_exists(rebase_path_dropped());
> ++ incorrect = todo_list_parse_insn_buffer(r, todo_list->buf.buf, todo_list) |
> ++ file_exists(rebase_path_dropped());
>
> if (todo_list_write_to_file(r, todo_list, todo_file, shortrevisions, shortonto,
> -1, flags | TODO_LIST_SHORTEN_IDS | TODO_LIST_APPEND_TODO_HELP))
> @@ rebase-interactive.c: int edit_todo_list(struct repository *r, struct todo_list
> - if (initial && copy_file(rebase_path_todo_backup(), todo_file, 0666))
> - return error(_("could not copy '%s' to '%s'."), todo_file,
> - rebase_path_todo_backup());
> -+ if (initial && copy_file(todo_backup, todo_file, 0666))
> -+ return error(_("could not copy '%s' to '%s'."), todo_file, todo_backup);
> ++ if (initial || !incorrect) {
> ++ if (!initial)
> ++ unlink(todo_backup);
> ++
> ++ if (copy_file(todo_backup, todo_file, 0666))
> ++ return error(_("could not copy '%s' to '%s'."), todo_file, todo_backup);
> ++ }
>
> if (launch_sequence_editor(todo_file, &new_todo->buf, NULL))
> return -2;
> @@ rebase-interactive.c: int edit_todo_list(struct repository *r, struct todo_list
> + } else if (todo_list_check(todo_list, new_todo)) {
> + write_file(rebase_path_dropped(), "");
> + return -4;
> -+ } else {
> -+ todo_list_write_to_file(r, todo_list, todo_backup, shortrevisions, shortonto,
> -+ -1, flags | TODO_LIST_SHORTEN_IDS | TODO_LIST_APPEND_TODO_HELP);
> + }
>
> return 0;
> @@ t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh: test_expect_success 'rebase -i respects rebase.mi
> + git add file1 &&
> + git rebase --continue
> +'
> ++
> ++test_expect_success 'rebase.missingCommitsCheck = error when editing for a second time' '
> ++ test_config rebase.missingCommitsCheck error &&
> ++ (
> ++ set_fake_editor &&
> ++ FAKE_LINES="1 break 2 3" git rebase -i A D &&
> ++ cp .git/rebase-merge/git-rebase-todo todo &&
> ++ test_must_fail env FAKE_LINES=2 git rebase --edit-todo &&
> ++ GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR="cp todo" git rebase --edit-todo &&
> ++ git rebase --continue
> ++ )
> ++'
> +
> test_expect_success 'respects rebase.abbreviateCommands with fixup, squash and exec' '
> rebase_setup_and_clean abbrevcmd &&
> --
> 2.24.1
>
>