Re: [PATCH 3/3] sequencer: run post-commit hook
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Oct 10, 2019, 21:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1910102324140.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <acaa086a4860b6853bc0f35dae7fcf07d3aa59e7.1570732608.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Hi Phillip,
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019, Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
>
> Prior to commit 356ee4659b ("sequencer: try to commit without forking
> 'git commit'", 2017-11-24) the sequencer would always run the
> post-commit hook after each pick or revert as it forked `git commit` to
> create the commit. The conversion to committing without forking `git
> commit` omitted to call the post-commit hook after creating the commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>Makes sense.
Show 17 quoted lines
> --- > builtin/commit.c | 2 +- > sequencer.c | 5 +++++ > sequencer.h | 1 + > t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/builtin/commit.c b/builtin/commit.c > index d898a57f5d..adb8c89c60 100644 > --- a/builtin/commit.c > +++ b/builtin/commit.c > @@ -1653,7 +1653,7 @@ int cmd_commit(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > > repo_rerere(the_repository, 0); > run_command_v_opt(argv_gc_auto, RUN_GIT_CMD); > - run_commit_hook(use_editor, get_index_file(), "post-commit", NULL); > + run_post_commit_hook(use_editor, get_index_file());
Does it really make sense to abstract the hook name away? It adds a lot of churn for just two callers...
Show 15 quoted lines
> if (amend && !no_post_rewrite) {
> commit_post_rewrite(the_repository, current_head, &oid);
> }
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index 3ce578c40b..b4947f6969 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -1173,6 +1173,10 @@ static int run_prepare_commit_msg_hook(struct repository *r,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +void run_post_commit_hook(int editor_is_used, const char *index_file) {
> + run_commit_hook(editor_is_used, index_file, "post-commit", NULL);
> +}
> +If we must have a separate `run_post_commit_hook()`, then it should be an `inline` function, defined in the header. Or even a macro to begin with.
Show 8 quoted lines
> static const char implicit_ident_advice_noconfig[] =
> N_("Your name and email address were configured automatically based\n"
> "on your username and hostname. Please check that they are accurate.\n"
> @@ -1427,6 +1431,7 @@ static int try_to_commit(struct repository *r,
> goto out;
> }
>
> + run_post_commit_hook(0, r->index_file);So this is the _actual_ change of this patch.
Show 26 quoted lines
> if (flags & AMEND_MSG) > commit_post_rewrite(r, current_head, oid); > > diff --git a/sequencer.h b/sequencer.h > index b0419d6ddb..e3e73c5635 100644 > --- a/sequencer.h > +++ b/sequencer.h > @@ -203,4 +203,5 @@ int sequencer_get_last_command(struct repository* r, > enum replay_action *action); > LAST_ARG_MUST_BE_NULL > int run_commit_hook(int editor_is_used, const char *index_file, const char *name, ...); > +void run_post_commit_hook(int editor_is_used, const char *index_file); > #endif /* SEQUENCER_H */ > diff --git a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh > index d2f1d5bd23..d9217235b6 100755 > --- a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh > +++ b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh > @@ -1467,4 +1467,21 @@ test_expect_success 'valid author header when author contains single quote' ' > test_cmp expected actual > ' > > +test_expect_success 'post-commit hook is called' ' > + test_when_finished "rm -f .git/hooks/post-commit commits" && > + mkdir -p .git/hooks && > + write_script .git/hooks/post-commit <<-\EOS && > + git rev-parse HEAD >>commits
Should `commits` be initialized before this script is written, e.g. using
>commits &&
?
> + EOS > + set_fake_editor &&
The `set_fake_editor` function sets a global environment variable, and therefore needs to be run in a subshell. Therefore, this line (as well as the next one) need to be enclosed in `( ... )`.
> + FAKE_LINES="edit 4 1 reword 2 fixup 3" git rebase -i A E && > + echo x>file3 &&
We usually leave no space after the `>`, but we _do_ leave a space _before_ the `>`.
Show 5 quoted lines
> + git add file3 &&
> + FAKE_COMMIT_MESSAGE=edited git rebase --continue &&
> + # rev-list does not support -g --reverse
> + git rev-list --no-walk=unsorted HEAD@{5} HEAD@{4} HEAD@{3} HEAD@{2} \
> + HEAD@{1} HEAD >expected &&Wouldn't this be better as:
git rev-parse HEAD@{5} HEAD@{4} HEAD@{3} HEAD@{2} HEAD@{1} HEAD \
>expect &&> + test_cmp expected commits
We usually use the name `expect` instead of `expected` in the test suite.
Thanks, Dscho
Show 6 quoted lines
> +' > + > test_done > -- > gitgitgadget >