Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] Teach the builtin rebase about the builtin interactive rebase
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Oct 12, 2018, 07:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1810120957480.45@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqy3bavdmk.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio,
On Sun, 7 Oct 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> > writes: > > > Note: while this patch targets pk/rebase-in-c-6-final, it will not work > > correctly without ag/rebase-i-in-c. So my suggestion is to rewrite the > > pk/rebas-in-c-6-final branch by first merging ag/rebase-i-in-c, then > > applying this here patch, and only then cherry-pick "rebase: default to > > using the builtin rebase". > > Is this a stale comment in the context of v3, where we pretty much > know how the resulting topic should intertwine with other topics? I > am trying to see if I have do to anything differently this time, or > just replacing the single commit while keeping the structure around > that commit the same is fine.
Just replacing the single commit. For technical reasons, I still have to target pk/rebase-in-c-6-final in my branch.
> Also, I see there is a new iteration v8 of ag/rebase-i-in-c on the > list, sent on Sep 27th (you were CC'ed but I suspect it was before > you came back). Are you happy with that update?
To be quite honest, I did not yet have time to look over it, but I verified that it has my suggested fix for the -S option.
Ciao, Dscho