Re: [PATCH 0/1] Teach the builtin rebase about the builtin interactive rebase

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> >> Please include this information in the commit message.  It's super
> >> helpful to find this kind of information about why a patch does what
> >> it does when encountering a patch later "in the wild" (in git log -S
> >> output).
> >
> > I thought I did include the relevant part? As to the full back story: I
> > was repeatedly dressed down by Junio in recent attempts to include more
> > motivation in my commit messages. So I am reluctant to do as you say,
> > because Junio is the BDFL here.
> 
> I do recall discouraging you from including irrelevant rant/whine in
> the log message a few times in the recent past, and also I do recall
> you never listening to me.  Don't make me an excuse.

> of what you did write in [1/1].  You wrote that it is no longer a
> shell script and needs to follow a separate calling convention.
> What was missing from that description that was given in [0/1] is
> why the original "rebase-in-c" series was done while pretending that
> the other effort "rebase-i-in-c" did not even exist, which made it
> necessary to do this change as a separate step.
> 
> And I tend to agree that it _is_ a relevant story in this case.
> 
>