Re: git push default behaviour?
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 9, 2012, 14:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <m3mx7pzvia.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vipie85nk.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
[I'm sorry if you received duplicate]
Nb. instead of using `--force` to force push of all relevant branches, you can always force push of single branch with `+branch`...
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes: > > > And regardless of the danger, if I look around me, I see almost only > > people working with shared archives, and a few projects (including Git, > > obviously) using the "one commiter per repository" workflow (I teach Git > > These days, you do not have to even go to kernel.org to find people > and projects that use "publish to be pulled" model. I hear that > there is a popular site called GitHub where people create their own > fork, publish their work there and ask the project they forked from > to pull their work. > > By the way, don't we ask the workflow used by the users in the > annual user survey?
There is "23) How do you publish/propagate your changes?"[1] but it doesn't tell if responder was using shared repository approach, or one fork per person approach.
This would be a good question to ask in this year, I think... [1]: https://www.survs.com/results/Q5CA9SKQ/P7DE07F0PL
-- Jakub Narebski