Re: [RFC PATCH] push: start warning upcoming default change for push.default
- From
Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>
- Date
- Mar 12, 2012, 15:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4F5E12A5.6030701@xiplink.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4F5AF1A8.4050604@alum.mit.edu>
On 12-03-10 01:16 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> > I propose that the default should be even stricter: like "current", it > would push to an branch with the same name as the current local branch, > *but only if that branch already exists on the remote*. It would only > be possible to create a new branch on the remote by calling "git push" > with an explicit branch argument. I believe that such a policy would do > the right thing in the cases where the "right thing" is pretty > unambiguous, and would require a user decision in other cases.
I haven't thought it through very deeply, but at first glance this seems like reasonable default behaviour to me.
M.