Re: [PATCH 0/5] some shell portability fixes

>
> "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On 11/7/07, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 11/7/07, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> >> > [2/5] Gaah, AIX sed X-<.  I am not opposed to this patch but
> >> >       would want to get Yays from people with non GNU sed.  Is
> >> >       busybox sed good enough to grok our scripts these days?
> >> >       Please ask help and collect Acks at least from folks on
> >> >       Solaris, MacOS, FBSD, and OBSD.
> >>
> >> I haven't extensively used all the scripts. There seems to be no
> >> sed-related failure from git testsuite results in my git-box branch.
> >> So I would say for now it's good enough.
> >
> > Argh, should have made it clear, busybox sed is good enough.
>
> Thanks.  And you can also happy grok Ralf's rewritten construct,
> right?
>
> That is, existing
>
>         $ sed -e 's/foo/\n/' file
>
> will be rewritten by the patch [2/5] to
>
>         $ sed -e 's/foo/\
>         /' file
>
>