Re: [PATCH 0/5] some shell portability fixes
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Nov 7, 2007, 14:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711071446190.4362@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <e2b179460711070617h7e9af64egcde5122808a4d924@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Mike Ralphson wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano wrote on Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 09:46:35PM CET: > > [2/5] Gaah, AIX sed X-<. I am not opposed to this patch but > > would want to get Yays from people with non GNU sed. Is > > busybox sed good enough to grok our scripts these days? > > Please ask help and collect Acks at least from folks on > > Solaris, MacOS, FBSD, and OBSD. > > On Nov 6, 2007 11:25 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote: > > As Junio commented in the part you did not quote, there are better shells > > in Solaris. Use those. > > Equally GNU sed is available as a drop-in rpm for AIX. I wonder if it > would be worth adding > Makefile support for a PATH prefix for the git scripts, so they could > prepend (in this case) > something like /opt/freeware/bin or /usr/linux/bin ? > > In our AIX environment many GNU tools are installed but I can't > guarantee they come first > in the paths of the git users. > > I'm willing to work up a patch if there's any interest.
Would that be a task for configure? Because I am not sure if the GNU tools are installed in the same place on all AIX boxen...
Ciao, Dscho