Re: [PATCH (v2) 2/2] rebase -i: teach --onto A...B syntax

From: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Date: Jan 8, 2010, 20:37 UTC
Message-ID: <fabb9a1e1001081237n11fa61b5m63fa46fac2ad8d4a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <32541b131001081231x1b6ac8c1k30084e4abf8cc896@mail.gmail.com>

Heya,

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 15:31, Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 5 quoted lines

> Thanks, I didn't know about that one.  But my general point is still:
> we seem to have two implementations when the functionality of one is
> actually a superset of the other.  As far as I can see, anyway.  So
> the obvious way to reduce the duplicated code is to simply eliminate
> the less-featureful implementation.

*cough* git sequencer *cough*

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier