From: Sverre Rabbelier Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:37:44 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH (v2) 2/2] rebase -i: teach --onto A...B syntax Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <32541b131001081231x1b6ac8c1k30084e4abf8cc896@mail.gmail.com> Heya, On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 15:31, Avery Pennarun wrote: > Thanks, I didn't know about that one.  But my general point is still: > we seem to have two implementations when the functionality of one is > actually a superset of the other.  As far as I can see, anyway.  So > the obvious way to reduce the duplicated code is to simply eliminate > the less-featureful implementation. *cough* git sequencer *cough* -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier