Re: [PATCH (v2) 2/2] rebase -i: teach --onto A...B syntax
Show 11 quoted lines
> Heya,
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 15:31, Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks, I didn't know about that one. But my general point is still:
>> we seem to have two implementations when the functionality of one is
>> actually a superset of the other. As far as I can see, anyway. So
>> the obvious way to reduce the duplicated code is to simply eliminate
>> the less-featureful implementation.
>
> *cough* git sequencer *cough*
>
*cough* not in my ${PATH} *cough*A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>