Re: [PATCH] tests: handle NO_PYTHON setting
- From
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 30, 2009, 07:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <fabb9a1e0911292355v260b9f0ck79d993e25f0c5c61@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20091130075221.GA5421@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Heya,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 08:52, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> This feels a little funny for NO_PYTHON to mean "no remote helpers at > all". But that is the way the Makefile is set up, since we seem to have > only python helpers.
I don't understand what you mean? Do you mean NO_PYTHON implies "no remote helpers at all", or "not having any remote helpers" implies NO_PYTHON? Either way, I'm not sure how to set it up differently, not having that much Makefile foo myself, so maybe Johan and Daniel could comment?
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier