From: Sverre Rabbelier Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:55:51 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: handle NO_PYTHON setting Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20091130075221.GA5421@coredump.intra.peff.net> Heya, On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 08:52, Jeff King wrote: > This feels a little funny for NO_PYTHON to mean "no remote helpers at > all". But that is the way the Makefile is set up, since we seem to have > only python helpers. I don't understand what you mean? Do you mean NO_PYTHON implies "no remote helpers at all", or "not having any remote helpers" implies NO_PYTHON? Either way, I'm not sure how to set it up differently, not having that much Makefile foo myself, so maybe Johan and Daniel could comment? -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier