Re: [PATCH 00/10] Advertise trace2 SID in protocol capabilities

> Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com> writes:
> 
>>> So the value being passed between client and server over the
>>> protocol may look like `<sid1>/<sid2>/<sid3>` rather than just a
>>> single `<sid_x>` term.  For your purposes, do you want or care if
>>> you get the single term or the full SID ?
>>
>> I'm not sure we care too much one way or the other. A single component
>> of the SID should be enough to join client & server logs, but it's
>> easier to just send the whole thing.
> 
> It may be worth documenting this design decision in the protocol
> doc; even though protocol doc may say this should be treated as an
> opaque token, people may assume certain structure.
>