Re: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation/remote-helpers: Clarify "curl" family of remote helpers
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 29, 2010, 07:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <f3271551003290014t6fa8ce57s4ecda041c8a00a61@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vy6hb8vpv.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
> I don't see anything wrong with "curl family". Individually they may be > http, https, etc. remote helper, but if you need a name to collectively > call them, you would want to say "curl family of helpers"; "curl helpers" > simply doesn't make sense.
Okay. Since this depends on the corresponding PATCH 1/2, which is currently under debate, I suggest that we drop this patch. Yes, the older version of the paragraph slightly confusing as Tay pointed out, but I don't know how to make it any clearer without getting into invocation details.
-- Ram