From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:14:43 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Documentation/remote-helpers: Clarify "curl" family of remote helpers
Message-ID: <f3271551003290014t6fa8ce57s4ecda041c8a00a61@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vy6hb8vpv.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Hi,

> I don't see anything wrong with "curl family".  Individually they may be
> http, https, etc. remote helper, but if you need a name to collectively
> call them, you would want to say "curl family of helpers"; "curl helpers"
> simply doesn't make sense.

Okay. Since this depends on the corresponding PATCH 1/2, which is
currently under debate, I suggest that we drop this patch. Yes, the
older version of the paragraph slightly confusing as Tay pointed out,
but I don't know how to make it any clearer without getting into
invocation details.

-- Ram