Re: git patch
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 6, 2006, 10:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <el65h9$tfj$2@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <4576937D.1070402@xs4all.nl>
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> I think it would be more logical to show those diffs as part of > git-status and perhaps git-commit, eg. > > git-commit --dry-run <commitoptions> > > shows the diff of what would be committed > > git-status --diff > > shows diffs of modified files in the working tree. > > This makes it more clear what each diff means.
I'd rather say
git-commit --diff
or
git-diff --commit
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git