From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:22:32 GMT
Subject: Re: git patch
Message-ID: <el65h9$tfj$2@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <4576937D.1070402@xs4all.nl>

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

> I think it would be more logical to show those diffs as part of
> git-status and perhaps git-commit, eg.
> 
>   git-commit --dry-run <commitoptions>
> 
> shows the diff of what would be committed
> 
>   git-status --diff
> 
> shows diffs of modified files in the working tree.
> 
> This makes it more clear what each diff means.

I'd rather say

  git-commit --diff

or

  git-diff --commit

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git