Re: [PATCH] cvs-migration document: make the need for "push" more obvious
- From
- Graham Percival <gpermus@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 6, 2006, 21:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <45773002.5020409@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20061206172450.GE1714@fieldses.org>
J. Bruce Fields wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> We should start out with the assumption that a shared repo is already > set up and make it: > > committing to a shared repository > creating a shared repository > importing a cvs archive > > which puts it in stuff-most-people-need-to-know to > stuff-less-people-need-to-know order. Maybe the current introduction > should even be postponed to later.
Yes, definitely!
I'm not complaining about changing to git, but Dscho's comment really rings true:
> A developer, especially those whom Git is forced upon, have an > attention span shorter than their pub1c hair.
I'm in the middle of exam period, I have a term papers to write, and I have two weeks of lilypond bug reports and doc typos to process. I don't care if git can do branches really nicely or walk my dog or cure cancer. I can look at that stuff later -- right now I just want to fix things and upload them.
Cheers,