Re: git patch

From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xs4all.nl>
Date: Dec 6, 2006, 11:27 UTC
Message-ID: <4576A916.7090801__8302.57246639139$1165404468$gmane$org@xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612061147540.28348@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>

Johannes Schindelin escreveu:

Show 9 quoted lines

>> shows the diff of the change that he just introduced
> 
> Okay. But you mean
> 
> $ git commit --dry file1 file2...
> 
> or
> 
> $ git commit --dry -a

Well, --dry would be usable both with -a and file1, file2.

I agree with Jakub that --diff might be a better name, but it should be part of git-commit command, rather than the git-diff.

> Or, you use the script git-hunk-commit.bash which I posted. Which reminds 
> me: I wanted to rewrite it for you so it is more non-brand-new-bash 
> friendly.

:)

that's really nice, but actually recording separate hunks is a bit of
a headache if you have to do it over the command line. Under darcs, I
always use darcsum in emacs. In git, I always use git-status.

-- 
 Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen