Re: [OT] Re: C++ *for Git*
- From
- Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 23, 2007, 15:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <e5bfff550709230815r773a4ad2u47bf854cacc236b6@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <85zlzdo3ch.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
On 9/23/07, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> > > > Perhaps I have misunderstood, but the idea I got is that for Linus > > OO brings in more problems than what it tries to fix. > > I read that as OO bringing in more programmers capable of creating > problems than those capable of fixing them. > > It is not the fault of OO in itself, but it is the bottom line that > counts: if it draws the wrong audience for the wrong reasons, it > better had great benefits to offset that.
Perhaps I'm wrong, but I think one of the advantages of big projects written in C vs comparable size projects in an OO language (read C++) it's exactly the opposite.
Because C lets a random developer to understand, quickly enough, and do little local modifications also to big projects like Linux, it attracts a lot of developers that have the possibility to start with some janitorial work or some little patch without incurring in the very steep learning curve you have understanding the object hierarchy of a big C++ code base, an almost mandatory step, before to start hacking as example in Firefox.
This is, IMHO, a big advantage: fresh meat is always welcomed, the damage it can potentially create is more then compensated by the long term benefit of a large and live developer community.
Marco