Re: [OT] Re: C++ *for Git*

> I'd say being forced to be explicit is a good thing here, so that the
> programmer at least has some sort of good understanding of what is
> going on, and chances are that if he doesn't really know, things just
> won't work out (quite unlike a lot of other languages where this
> programmer might actually end up with something half-assed that
> "mostly" works).
> For some reason it seems to me a lot harder to find bad programmers
> surviving using C than a lot of the other languages.