git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

[PATCH v2 0/4] midx repack: fix overflow on 32 bit systems

From
PWPhillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Date
May 22, 2025, 15:55 UTC
Message-ID
<cover.1747929225.git.phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
In-Reply-To
<cover.1747753388.git.phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>

Thanks to Taylor and Ben for their comments on V1. Changes since V1:

 - Patch 1: style fix and clarified commit message
 - Patch 4: reworded commit message and documentation
Cover Letter for V1:

This series fixes an overflow when running "git multi-pack-index repack" on an old raspberry pi and a couple of other small issues I noticed while reading the code. I'm unsure how realistic the example of integer overflow on 64 bit systems in patch 2 is. I'm happy to drop it if people who work with large repositories think its not worth worrying about.

Base-Commit: cb96e1697ad6e54d11fc920c95f82977f8e438f8
Published-As: https://github.com/phillipwood/git/releases/tag/pw%2Fmidx-repack-overflow%2Fv2
View-Changes-At: https://github.com/phillipwood/git/compare/cb96e1697...a140181bd
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/phillipwood/git pw/midx-repack-overflow/v2
Phillip Wood (4):
  midx repack: avoid integer overflow on 32 bit systems
  midx repack: avoid potential integer overflow on 64 bit systems
  midx: avoid negative array index
  midx docs: clarify tie breaking
 Documentation/git-multi-pack-index.adoc | 11 +++++++----
 git-compat-util.h                       | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 midx-write.c                            | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Range-diff against v1:
1:  cbc5e69b908 ! 1:  9a1e6c81688 midx repack: avoid integer overflow on 32 bit systems
    @@ Commit message
     
         can overflow as both total_size and estimated_size can be greater that
         SIZE_MAX / 2. This is addressed by using saturating arithmetic for the
    -    addition.
    +    addition. Although estimated_size is of type uint64_t by the time we
    +    reach this sum it is bounded by the batch size which is of type size_t
    +    and so casting estimated_size to size_t does not truncate the value.
     
         Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
     
    @@ midx-write.c: static void fill_included_packs_batch(struct repository *r,
      			continue;
      
     -		total_size += expected_size;
    -+		if (unsigned_add_overflows (total_size, (size_t)expected_size))
    ++		if (unsigned_add_overflows(total_size, (size_t)expected_size))
     +			total_size = SIZE_MAX;
     +		else
     +			total_size += expected_size;
2:  9f07da4fe71 = 2:  54303d96c31 midx repack: avoid potential integer overflow on 64 bit systems
3:  688b0273604 = 3:  5b6cfb9d212 midx: avoid negative array index
4:  29769df1c60 ! 4:  a140181bd57 midx docs: clarify tie breaking
    @@ Commit message
         midx docs: clarify tie breaking
     
         Clarify what happens when an object exists in more than one pack, but
    -    not in the preferred pack. If the user does not pass a preferred pack
    -    then the pack with the lowest mtime is chosen as the preferred pack. For
    -    objects that are not in the preferred pack the pack with the highest
    -    mtime is used. "git multi-pack-index repack" relies on this behavior. If
    -    ties were resolved in favor of the oldest pack as the current
    -    documentation suggests the multi-pack index would not reference any of
    -    the objects in the pack created by "git multi-pack-index repack".
    +    not in the preferred pack. "git multi-pack-index repack" relies on ties
    +    for objects that are not in the preferred pack being resolved in favor
    +    of the newest pack that contains a copy of the object. If ties were
    +    resolved in favor of the oldest pack as the current documentation
    +    suggests the multi-pack index would not reference any of the objects in
    +    the pack created by "git multi-pack-index repack".
     
    +    Helped-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
         Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
     
      ## Documentation/git-multi-pack-index.adoc ##
     @@ Documentation/git-multi-pack-index.adoc: write::
    + +
    + --
      	--preferred-pack=<pack>::
    - 		Optionally specify the tie-breaking pack used when
    - 		multiple packs contain the same object. `<pack>` must
    +-		Optionally specify the tie-breaking pack used when
    +-		multiple packs contain the same object. `<pack>` must
     -		contain at least one object. If not given, ties are
     -		broken in favor of the pack with the lowest mtime.
    -+		contain at least one object. If not given the pack with
    -+		the lowest mtime is used as the preferred pack. Ties
    -+		for objects that are not contained in the preferred
    -+		are resolved in favor of the pack with the newest mtime.
    ++		When specified, break ties in favor of this pack when
    ++		there are additional copies of its objects in other
    ++		packs. Ties for objects not found in the preferred
    ++		pack are always resolved in favor of the copy in the
    ++		pack with the highest mtime. If unspecified, the pack
    ++		with the lowest mtime is used by default. The
    ++		preferred pack must have at least one object.
      
      	--[no-]bitmap::
      		Control whether or not a multi-pack bitmap is written.
-- 
2.49.0.897.gfad3eb7d210
Previous: D. Ben KnobleNext: Phillip Wood
Message 18 of 25 in “midx repack: fix overflow on 32 bit systems”
  1. 0/4 midx repack: fix overflow on 32 bit systemsPhillip Wood, May 20, 2025
  2. 1/4 midx repack: avoid integer overflow on 32 bit systemsPhillip Wood, May 20, 2025
  3. Taylor BlauMay 20, 2025
  4. Phillip WoodMay 21, 2025
  5. Taylor BlauMay 23, 2025
  6. D. Ben KnobleMay 21, 2025
  7. Junio C HamanoMay 21, 2025
  8. Phillip WoodMay 21, 2025
  9. 2/4 midx repack: avoid potential integer overflow on 64 bit systemsPhillip Wood, May 20, 2025
  10. Taylor BlauMay 20, 2025
  11. Phillip WoodMay 21, 2025
  12. 3/4 midx: avoid negative array indexPhillip Wood, May 20, 2025
  13. Taylor BlauMay 20, 2025
  14. 4/4 midx docs: clarify tie breakingPhillip Wood, May 20, 2025
  15. Taylor BlauMay 20, 2025
  16. Phillip WoodMay 21, 2025
  17. D. Ben KnobleMay 21, 2025
  18. 0/4 midx repack: fix overflow on 32 bit systemsPhillip Wood, May 22, 2025
  19. 2/4 midx repack: avoid potential integer overflow on 64 bit systemsPhillip Wood, May 22, 2025
  20. 1/4 midx repack: avoid integer overflow on 32 bit systemsPhillip Wood, May 22, 2025
  21. 3/4 midx: avoid negative array indexPhillip Wood, May 22, 2025
  22. 4/4 midx docs: clarify tie breakingPhillip Wood, May 22, 2025
  23. Taylor BlauMay 23, 2025
  24. Phillip WoodMay 27, 2025
  25. Junio C HamanoMay 27, 2025

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.