Re: [Summit topic] Server-side merge/rebase: needs and wants?
On 21/10/21 18.56, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> 5. The challenge is not necessarily the technical challenges, but the UX for
> server tools that live “above” the git executable.
>
> 1. What kind of output is needed? Machine-readable error messages?
>
> 2. What Git objects must be created: a tree? A commit?
>
> 3. How to handle, report, and store conflicts? Index is not typically
> available on the server.
1) I prefer human-readable (i.e. l10n-able) output, because the output
messages for server-side merge/rebase are user-facing.
2) Same as when doing merge/rebase on local machine (merge commit if
non-ff).
3) I think because on the server-side we have bare repo (instead of
normal repo), we need to create temporary index just for merge/rebase.
For conflicts, the users need to resolve them locally, then notify the
server that they have been resolved, and continue merging process.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>