Re: [PATCH 2/3] git add --intent-to-add: fix removal of cached emptiness
- From
- Sverre Rabbelier <alturin@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 29, 2008, 15:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <bd6139dc0811290738qbd93ff6oa7aa854708009075@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vprkf2nki.fsf_-_@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 04:55, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> This uses the extended index flag mechanism introduced earlier to mark > the entries added to the index via "git add -N" with CE_INTENT_TO_ADD.
Is 'intent' [0] used properly here? Should it not be 'intend' [1]?
[0] http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/intent [1] http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/intend
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier