From: Sverre Rabbelier Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:38:12 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] git add --intent-to-add: fix removal of cached emptiness Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vprkf2nki.fsf_-_@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 04:55, Junio C Hamano wrote: > This uses the extended index flag mechanism introduced earlier to mark > the entries added to the index via "git add -N" with CE_INTENT_TO_ADD. Is 'intent' [0] used properly here? Should it not be 'intend' [1]? [0] http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/intent [1] http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/intend -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier