Re: theirs/ours was Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy
- From
- Sverre Rabbelier <alturin@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 29, 2008, 00:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <bd6139dc0807281709u43218e97p8ba239f3e520e10@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807290123300.2725@eeepc-johanness>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:27, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> To me, this suggests that they were too married to 'production' being the > "dominant" branch.
<snip>
> If the result should become the state of 'x', too, I would then just > 'git push origin y:x'.
But this means that everybody doing a 'git pull' on that repo will get complaints when pulling, right? Should they just send out a message to all their users that they'll need to rebase all their changes now? (Not being sarcastic, am trying to work out what the recommended workflow is here.)
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier