Re: theirs/ours was Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jul 29, 2008, 04:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080729043117.GB26997@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <bd6139dc0807281709u43218e97p8ba239f3e520e10@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:09:18AM +0200, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> > If the result should become the state of 'x', too, I would then just > > 'git push origin y:x'. > > But this means that everybody doing a 'git pull' on that repo will get > complaints when pulling, right? Should they just send out a message to > all their users that they'll need to rebase all their changes now? > (Not being sarcastic, am trying to work out what the recommended > workflow is here.)
I think you are missing the fact that he is doing this push _after_ having merged the history into master via "-s ours". So it is a fast-forward to push at that point.
-Peff