Re: theirs/ours was Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 28, 2008, 21:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vvdyppv4c.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <bd6139dc0807281324k38198fffwd3b586394b354ed2@mail.gmail.com>
"Sverre Rabbelier" <alturin@gmail.com> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 22:20, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> "Sverre Rabbelier" <alturin@gmail.com> writes: >>> Mhhh, but the proposed strategy there was in response to the 'insane' >>> git-merge-theirs version, not to the 'exact opposite of >>> git-merge-ours' that I refer to now, yes? >> >> No. > > Nanako Shiraishi's patch was not in response to the "git-merge-theirs" > thread, or I am missing something here....?
The quoted sentence by me in that message was after I explained why "per hunk theirs" aka "-Xtheirs" was not such a great idea I further went on to say "by the way, '-s theirs' is even worse and here is why".