Re: theirs/ours was Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy
- From
- Sverre Rabbelier <alturin@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 28, 2008, 20:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <bd6139dc0807281324k38198fffwd3b586394b354ed2@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vljzlrca9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 22:20, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> "Sverre Rabbelier" <alturin@gmail.com> writes: >> Mhhh, but the proposed strategy there was in response to the 'insane' >> git-merge-theirs version, not to the 'exact opposite of >> git-merge-ours' that I refer to now, yes? > > No.
Nanako Shiraishi's patch was not in response to the "git-merge-theirs" thread, or I am missing something here....?
-- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier