Re: [PATCH] Avoid errors from git-rev-parse in gitweb blame
- From
- Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgarciasuarez@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 3, 2008, 14:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <b77c1dce0806030740td820c52ve45619812313776c@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <200806031614.29161.jnareb@gmail.com>
2008/6/3 Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>:
Show 8 quoted lines
>> Shameless plug : the sources for perl 5 are currently being kept in a >> perforce repository. There is a rough web interface to it at >> http://public.activestate.com/cgi-bin/perlbrowse with excellent blame >> log navigation features (including navigation against p4 >> integrations). > > By the way, what is the difference between '<<' links and 'br' link > in the above mentioned annotate/blame interface?
"br" navigates to another branch from which this file has been integrated (in p4 speak.)
Show 12 quoted lines
> I'd like to say that I prefer gitweb's marking blame by blocks, not by > lines, and extra info on mouseover. But having blame navigation > capability of perforce web interface would be really nice (I think > "git gui blame" has something like this; I don't know about other > tools like qgit, giggle, or ugit). > >> Since we're going to move the official perl 5 vcs to git (many many >> thanks to Sam Vilain for that, BTW), > > BTW. how in your opinion Git compares to Perforce, both as a tool > itself, and also about quality of companion tools such like gitweb > or git-gui?
I'm not using companion tools much, but I'm really impatient to switch to git. (I'm often working offline and applying patches from mailboxes. That already makes two good reasons for switching:)
> I think it would be really nice. Will you want to use git-diff-tree > to mark differences from the version we came from (marked by 'hp', > 'hpb' and 'fp' URI parameters), or would you rather extend git-blame?
I don't know. I'll look at git-diff-tree.