Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] sequencer: leave auto maintenance to the end of a sequence

> Hi Thomas
> 
> On 17/09/2026 19:42, Thomas Bachem via GitGitGadget wrote:
> > Changes since v4:
> > 
> >   * 2/3 takes Patrick's wording, with two corrections: the sequencer itself
> >     spawns the "git commit" for a resolved conflict, and the apply backend
> >     belongs to "git rebase", not to the sequencer.
> >   * 3/3 opens with Phillip's sentence.
> >   * The header comment of git_config_append_parameter() is Patrick's, plus
> >     one sentence on a NULL value.
> >   * Both tests got a comment on which picks conflict and where the sequence
> >     stops (Phillip).
> 
> Thanks for adding that, it is easier to understand what the tests are doing
> now. This looks ready for next to me.
> 
> Thanks for working on it