Re: Minor annoyance with git push
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 9, 2008, 13:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802091304440.11591@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <46a038f90802090350rc4780d1ted60c03b9abf1fc0@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> And I don't completely follow how bad the impact of > auto-fast-forwarding local tracking branches on a merge. If it's a > fast-forward, my "local state" wasn't that exciting to begin with ;-)
Not necessarily. Maybe you wanted to work on it, kept your local branch as a reminder. Maybe even reset --hard to a known-bad commit.
The thing is: local is local is local. If you muddy the clear distinctions, you will make semantics much harder to grasp.
Having said that, you _could_ introduce a command line option "--ff-local-branches", which would keep the semantics clean.
Ciao, Dscho