Re: Minor annoyance with git push
- From
Steven Walter <stevenrwalter@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 21, 2008, 22:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080221223549.GA26266@dervierte>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802201535250.17164@racer.site>
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 03:38:31PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> That depends awfully on your definition of "safe". > > I, for one, hate the idea already, that I am "safe" when "git push" does > not do the thing I asked it to, and which it has done for a couple of > years now without complaint, and which I have gotten used to. > > And then, there will be a great confusion for me, since I work on 5 > different machines on an average day, with 5 different git versions, and > having different config settings.
Which is worse: pushing more refs than you intended (requiring rewinding refs on a repository that other people may pull from), or pushing fewer refs than you intended, requiring you to run the command a second time?
-- -Steven Walter <stevenrwalter@gmail.com> Freedom is the freedom to say that 2 + 2 = 4 B2F1 0ECC E605 7321 E818 7A65 FC81 9777 DC28 9E8F