git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Minor annoyance with git push

From
Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de>
Date
Feb 9, 2008, 11:22 UTC
Message-ID
<0456DF67-E0CB-4048-BB19-397D0C559F23@zib.de>
In-Reply-To
<20080209024636.GE2572@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Feb 9, 2008, at 3:46 AM, Jeff King wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
>>> Another way to "solve" this issue, of course, is to use the  
>>> remote layout.
>>> I did the switchover myself some time ago; it was hard at first,  
>>> since I
>>> was so used to just check out the branches I just fetched.  But  
>>> in the
>>> long run the distinction between local and tracking branches made  
>>> life
>>> much easier for me.
>>
>> What do you mean with "the remote layout"? I am using
>> "remotes"+tracking branches as far as I can tell...
>
> I think he means something like "if I have 'next' and 'origin/next',
> then I should check whether 'next' is a subset of 'origin/next'" and
> just say "nothing to send." But that suffers from the same "silently
> ignoring rewinds" as above. You could ignore the push if you have
> next exactly equal to origin/next, but that implies that you  
> haven't done
> any fetching (which is unlikely in the scenario you described).

A similar proposal was discussed last October/November and we already had patches. We decided against it. The reason is that the post-condition of "git push" is that all heads that are considered by the push shall be identical locally and at the remote. If "git push" does not achieve this it should report the branches for which the post-condition is not met.

I think Dscho means: do not duplicate remote branches as local branches. Keep the number of local branches as low as possible. Only if you want to work on a remote branch, create a local branch, commit you work, push, and *delete* the local branch.

However, I often use local branches as a reminder which remote branches I am actively monitoring. If I start to work on them I first review what's new with "gitk origin/topic --not topic" and then do the fast forward "git push . origin/topic:topic" before I actually start working "git checkout topic". For these branches, Dschos proposal does not work for me.

	Steffen
Previous: Jeff KingNext: Jeff King
Message 19 of 71 in “Minor annoyance with git push”
  1. Martin LanghoffFeb 8, 2008
  2. Martin LanghoffFeb 8, 2008
  3. Junio C HamanoFeb 8, 2008
  4. Steffen ProhaskaFeb 9, 2008
  5. Junio C HamanoFeb 10, 2008
  6. Johannes SchindelinFeb 10, 2008
  7. Johannes SchindelinFeb 8, 2008
  8. Martin LanghoffFeb 8, 2008
  9. Mike HommeyFeb 8, 2008
  10. SeanFeb 8, 2008
  11. Steffen ProhaskaFeb 8, 2008
  12. Johannes SchindelinFeb 8, 2008
  13. Martin LanghoffFeb 8, 2008
  14. Johannes SchindelinFeb 8, 2008
  15. Jeff KingFeb 9, 2008
  16. Jeff KingFeb 9, 2008
  17. Johannes SchindelinFeb 9, 2008
  18. Jeff KingFeb 9, 2008
  19. Steffen ProhaskaFeb 9, 2008
  20. Jeff KingFeb 9, 2008
  21. Junio C HamanoFeb 9, 2008
  22. Jeff KingFeb 9, 2008
  23. Martin LanghoffFeb 9, 2008
  24. Johannes SchindelinFeb 9, 2008
  25. Junio C HamanoFeb 10, 2008
  26. Jeff KingFeb 10, 2008
  27. Johannes SchindelinFeb 10, 2008
  28. [RFC] checkout to notice forks (Re: Minor annoyance with git push)Junio C Hamano, Feb 17, 2008
  29. Daniel BarkalowFeb 17, 2008
  30. Junio C HamanoFeb 17, 2008
  31. Daniel BarkalowFeb 17, 2008
  32. Junio C HamanoFeb 17, 2008
  33. Daniel BarkalowFeb 17, 2008
  34. Jeff KingFeb 17, 2008
  35. Santi BéjarFeb 20, 2008
  36. Martin LanghoffFeb 19, 2008
  37. checkout: tone down the "forked status" diagnostic messagesJunio C Hamano, Feb 20, 2008
  38. Jeff KingFeb 21, 2008
  39. checkout: updates to tracking reportJunio C Hamano, Feb 21, 2008
  40. Jay SoffianFeb 21, 2008
  41. Daniel BarkalowFeb 21, 2008
  42. Jay SoffianFeb 21, 2008
  43. Steffen ProhaskaFeb 9, 2008
  44. Johannes SchindelinFeb 9, 2008
  45. Junio C HamanoFeb 10, 2008
  46. Johannes SchindelinFeb 10, 2008
  47. Jeff KingFeb 10, 2008
  48. Johannes SchindelinFeb 10, 2008
  49. Jeff KingFeb 10, 2008
  50. Johannes SchindelinFeb 10, 2008
  51. Jeff KingFeb 10, 2008
  52. Junio C HamanoFeb 20, 2008
  53. Johannes SchindelinFeb 20, 2008
  54. Jay SoffianFeb 20, 2008
  55. Johannes SchindelinFeb 20, 2008
  56. Steven WalterFeb 21, 2008
  57. Johannes SchindelinFeb 22, 2008
  58. Jeff KingFeb 20, 2008
  59. Junio C HamanoFeb 20, 2008
  60. Jeff KingFeb 20, 2008
  61. Jeff KingFeb 20, 2008
  62. Junio C HamanoFeb 20, 2008
  63. Jeff KingFeb 20, 2008
  64. Wincent ColaiutaFeb 10, 2008
  65. Steven WalterFeb 10, 2008
  66. Johannes SchindelinFeb 10, 2008
  67. Johannes SchindelinFeb 10, 2008
  68. Wincent ColaiutaFeb 10, 2008
  69. Jeff KingFeb 10, 2008
  70. Junio C HamanoFeb 10, 2008
  71. Jeff KingFeb 10, 2008

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.