Re: [PATCH] filter-branch: assume HEAD if no revision supplied
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Jan 30, 2008, 20:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0801302034310.23907@racer.site>
- In-Reply-To
- <47A0D0F0.1020800@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Hi,
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Brandon Casey wrote:
> filter-branch previously took the first non-option argument as the name > for a new branch. Since dfd05e38, it now takes a revision or a revision > range and modifies the current branch. Update to operate on HEAD by > default to conform with standard git interface practice.
FWIW I think the code wanted to let "git filter-branch" without options print the usage.
Ciao, Dscho